CUSTODY BATTLE: HUSBAND MURDERS BROTHER-IN-LAW


CUSTODY BATTLE: HUSBAND MURDERS BROTHER-IN-LAW


In a decisive verdict on Monday, a Florida jury convicted Charles Adelson, a dentist, of murder in connection with the 2014 shooting death of his former brother-in-law, Dan Markel, a prominent law professor at Florida State University. The conviction follows a protracted custody battle between Adelson’s sister and Markel, adding a bitter layer to the case.

 

The jury's decision signals agreement with the prosecution's argument that Adelson orchestrated the murder of Markel by paying for the crime. Adelson was found guilty on charges of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, and solicitation of first-degree murder, as reported by The Tallahassee Democrat.

 

Markel's parents and sister, who endured the trial, expressed a mix of emotions after the verdict. Shelly Markel, Dan's sister, stated, "This has been a really long and terrible ordeal for all of us. It’s taken a long toll on our lives. And there’s a real sense of relief today."

 

The complex case stemmed from the divorce between Wendi Adelson, Charles Adelson's sister, and Dan Markel. The custody dispute over their two children intensified when Wendi sought to move to South Florida, closer to her family. The court, however, ruled against the relocation without Markel's consent, leading to a strained situation.

 

Prosecutors argued that Charles Adelson paid for the murder of Markel, utilizing Katherine Magbanua, his girlfriend, to hire Sigfredo Garcia, the father of her children, as the hitman. Garcia, in turn, enlisted the help of his friend Luis Rivera. Both Magbanua and Garcia were previously convicted of first-degree murder, while Rivera, after pleading guilty to second-degree murder, is serving a 19-year sentence.

 

Markel was shot in his car outside his Tallahassee home, adding a tragic turn to the legal drama.

 

During the trial, Adelson took the stand as the sole defense witness, vehemently denying any involvement in the murder. He portrayed himself as a victim of extortion, countering the prosecution's narrative. Adelson claimed that Magbanua approached him, alleging her friends were the actual killers, and demanded a significant sum of money to spare his life.

 

In closing arguments, prosecutors underscored inconsistencies in Adelson's testimony, asserting that the version presented in court did not align with the facts of the case. The guilty verdict now concludes a nine-year-old case marked by twists and turns, shedding light on a tumultuous chapter involving familial conflicts and alleged criminal conspiracies.

 


Click and follow NairaMatter on:

NairaMatter Updates    nairanowmatter .

NairaMatter  


Post a Comment

0 Comments